Good Thoughts

Editor Post in A Devotional Life
0

“Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable–if anything is excellent or praiseworthy–think about such things. Whatever you have learned or received or heard from me, or seen in me—put it into practice. And the God of peace will be with you.” (Philippians 4: 8-9)

 

It always amazes me how differently Scripture views what is ‘savvy’ or wise and truly practical. I didn’t grow up in an environment where people around me were streetwise or crafty or cunning. The reverse was true. But to be too philosophically idealistic was considered to be … impractical and gullible. Few however, compare with some of the people I have met along the way who, to me, really embody and exhibit cunning quite matchlessly. Certainly, they are incapable of being gulled and taken advantage of. Often, they are the culprits who take advantage of more gullible ones. Without conscience, without ethics to stand by their Christian convictions (alas, yes … Christians …), they are (strangely) regarded by many hapless types to be both clever and successful. This seems to be the way of the world.

But no. Oneupsmanship doesn’t do it. Being able to charm or argue or worm one’s way out of things doesn’t really mean cleverness or success at all. In fact, I think there’s something demeaningly ugly and sneaking about it all in a fawning Uriah Heep sort of way.

Philippians 4: 8-9 reads like a list of truly impractical things to do. But Scripture insists that this is how we will find peace and wisdom and discernment. The verses sound entirely impractical and naive and idealistic for good reason: they were meant to be! What saving grace! Instead of centering our minds on worthless things–such as, how can we best the other fellow; or, how can we wriggle out of a doubtful situation; or, how can we take a stab at someone without being caught–we should focus on thinking and doing what is morally excellent. Sounds like a Morals class. But it gets even more ‘impractical’! Paul encourages the Philippians to imitate him in his naive and idealistic thinking! Where was he anyway when he wrote to the Philippians but under house arrest in Rome!

Nevertheless, Paul assures us, this was the way to go. Think true, pure, noble, lovely, admirable, excellent, praiseworthy and right thoughts. Do the same, and Scripture promises, our lives will be full of God’s peace. Paul’s point is that these ‘impractical’ virtues are good for us to focus on because they are the qualities and expressions of God himself. They characterise God, and ought to characterise us too, if we are really, as we claim, the children of God.

‘True’ means what is ‘for real’, reliable and honest. It is from God, and is the exact opposite of false. ‘Noble’ refers to what is dignified and worthy of respect. ‘Right’ is whatever is upright and just, whatever conforms to God’s moral standards and which he would approve of. ‘Pure’ is whatever is morally wholesome, without any taint of impurity or moral alloy about it. ‘Lovely’ speaks of what is pleasing and attractive. ‘Admirable’ or ‘of good report’ denotes those things that are appealing and worth the words and breath we expend.

“If anything is excellent or praiseworthy, think about such things.” Oh dear, we are very far from taking this seriously. Yet Paul clearly tells the Philippians that as Christians, they have the ability to discern what is excellent or praiseworthy, and what is not. It is up to us what and how we think, and it is up to us whether our actions and lives live up to the Word of God and the character of God, whom we are to faithfully reflect.

If our lives are filled with peacelessness and conflict, we must return to such passages and consider ourselves in the light of what they say. Right thinking leads to right action. Right action results in God’s peace, his shalom that really means well-being and health and renewing freshness. Wrongful thoughts and acts lead to conflict and bitterness and peacelessness. “But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable” (James 3:17).

I think we need a realignment of our perspective with Scripture. God’s wisdom is, in fact, pure, meaning it has no ugly alloy about it. It has no hidden dark spot or muddiness that raises questions as to motive and agenda. It speaks truly and candidly, and always with the intention of love behind it. It is all light and sheds truth and realisation on a situation that makes things clearer to all–and not less clear. James agrees with Paul, in that God’s ways and character bring about peace: his wisdom results in peace, and is peaceable. With God, conflict and quarrelsomeness have no part.

These Philippians had learned and received, heard and seen, Paul’s words and behaviour enough to understand how centering on God’s thoughts and ways brought about the peace that should be evident in Christian living. His experience ought to be their experience. He was straighter than straight, and honest as honest comes. Did lesser types laugh at him and think him naive? Doubtless. But then, you see, they wouldn’t have had the peace of God, would they?

Paul knew how to live the normal Christian life. That is the only life we are called to live. It’s time to let Scripture edge its way into our heart’s core. Whether it burns dross away or enhances the gold that is already within us, let it do its work so that “the God of peace will be with [us].”

 

I know this rhyme is about politics, but it fits us so well today that I have to quote it:

There was a crooked man and he
walked a crooked mile,
He found a crooked sixpence upon a crooked
stile.
He bought a crooked cat, which caught a crooked mouse.
And they all
lived together in a little crooked house

NATO

Editor Post in A Devotional Life
0

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization or NATO, also called the (North) Atlantic Alliance, is an intergovernmental military alliance based on the North Atlantic Treaty which was signed on 4 April 1949 … the organization constitutes a system of collective defence whereby its member states agree to mutual defense in response to an attack by any external party. (Wikipedia)

Conversely, and for the purposes of this post, NATO also means No Action, Talk Only!

“For the kingdom of God is not a matter of talk but of power” (1 Corinthians 4: 20)

If life consisted only of the words we speak, I tell you, this would be a magnificent world. As it is though, the world is pretty nasty much of the time, which is why we often sing the song: “Look for the silver lining …” The rest of it, you see, is dark clouds.

Paul’s context was the arrogant and quarrelling Corinthians, of course. Drunk with the thought of spiritual power and position, these Corinthian leaders had been badmouthing Paul to the people (v. 19), claiming that he was nothing but an impotent and weak old man in comparison to themselves (2 Cor. 1: 17; 10: 10). Paul’s defence is interesting. Since the Corinthians were, by and large, quite enthralled by power, he answers their backbiting with verse 20: God’s kingdom is not proven in mere verbiage, but rather comes in the demonstration of his power over life changed, transformed, re-created and renewed. The “kingdom of God” phrase Paul uses (v. 20) is not eschatological, but refers to the now and present work of God reigning over his people and transforming their lives into the image of Jesus Christ. The power of Christ, Paul insists, is demonstrated and proven in the new creation and newness of life changed and liberated through the hearing of the gospel (Romans 1: 16). His challenge to the erring Corinthians was this: if they could demonstrate power through transformed lives which reflected God’s holiness and character, then he would certainly believe that they were right. If their power shows were nothing but big boasts, he would descend on them with the power and authority invested on him by God to discipline them (v. 21)! What would they prefer, he asks. Should he come to them with a whip, or in a spirit of gentleness? It really was up to them, but come to them he would.

It seems to me that the Christian walk today is full of “verbal pitfalls,” so much so that we are all terribly guilty of the sentiments expressed by the acronym NATO–and I’m not talking about any defence alliance! Yes indeed, we are (in)famous for No Action, Talk Only. We sing mighty songs in church though (“Touching heaven, changing earth,” no less!) … but they end when the service ends. We are quite incapable, many of us, to take the victory assured us in the powerful gospel, into the areas of our personal and communal defeats and bondages.  We imagine that spiritual effectiveness is seen in displays of power, of immediate answers from heaven to our petitions for our needs and wants: “Taste and see that the Lord is good!”

However, maturity and real spiritual effectiveness lie elsewhere. If our lives are not changed, then no amount of talk will make us pleasing to God (Colossians 1: 10) or convince others of our spirituality. People need to witness the transformation in us, to see the character and backbone in us, and to hear (yes, words not excepting …) our faithful proclamation and teaching of the ways of God.

If we don’t demonstrate the power of God at work in us through the gospel, then we must ask ourselves honestly: Am I really a follower of Christ? Am I an eikon, a fitting reflection and image of Christ, as he is of the Father? Or am I something else masquerading in Christian-sheep’s clothes, baa-ing away unconvincingly?

The more I read Paul, the more I understand that the power of God is nowhere expressed as well or perfectly as in the gospel. And nowhere can I be a more effective witness of that power than in the demonstration of a life that has been transformed by the touch of grace. I’m not talking about evangelism alone, or conversions. The gospel’s power extends far beyond that first step which we take, as Paul tells us.

There is no power show greater than this. There is no higher or worthier exploit that I could give my energies to than to yield myself to the re-creation of my person and being so that I become, crafted in God’s hands, an image of holiness and well-being.

All our so-called “deeds” for Christ, the plans we dream up in his Name, are very little in the end in comparison with the mighty gospel at work in the re-creation of a broken life. Christians keep stressing the wrong things, the small things, sometimes in very loud voices. No Action, Talk Only about the real issues! It’s strange how we puff up the inconsequential things that God is not overly-concerned about, like our fancy programmes and our buildings and our shows and our banners … these are the things of the world, they don’t warrant that much attention …

If we’re not careful, we will find ourselves like the boastful Corinthians. Perhaps it’s time for a spot check, just to see how we’re keeping our accounts books. God may well be asking us what Paul asked the Corinthians: “What do you prefer? Shall I come to you with a rod of discipline, or shall I come in love and with a gentle spirit?” I wonder what our answer is.

 

 

Can we please leave politics out??

Editor Post in I Say ...
0

Politics, said to be dirty, has been a particular bugbear for many Christians. In fact, many of us grew up in a generation that obeyed Romans 13 to the letter, whether or not we were Christian! Most of us baby boomers have a deep-seated suspicion of all things political, preferring to see ourselves as “spiritual” and our faith as confined to the ”religious” and personal or private sphere. Other things, quite beyond our Christian purview, are best left to “the world”. In recent days, though there have been seismic changes and movements that can prove to be cataclysmic both to our community and country.

The colour yellow ran into grave difficulties … so much so that our national football team had to change, chameleon-like, from yellow to blue for a day. Yellow and black are the national team’s home colours while blue, red and white are its away colours. But never mind … in the interests of peace etc., blue is the perfect hue. NGOs are now very keen to educate the public on both their rights and responsibilities as citizens. MCLM (Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement) held its first Citizen Empowerment School just days ago. I think the Malaysia of today is pretty different from the Malaysia of last July. Sentiments are changing … perspectives are evolving … not always to the liking of certain sectors, but then, you don’t have to please everyone all the time.

So what does the Christian do about all this … politics business? Some of us would like to steer clear of the letter P, especially after accusations levelled at us about building our kingdom on earth! Some others have jumped in at the deep end, leaving it to chance whether they sink or swim. Most of us … hmmm … we’re sort of on the fence, though it’s getting rather prickly here …

I was reading Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin (UTC) a few weeks ago. UTC is about slavery in 19th c. North America. It was amazing to me how contemporary the politics felt and sounded–though of course Malaysia has no such thing as slavery! God forbid! It was so easy and convenient to legalise what was essentially an unjust law, and even easier to justify it, it seems.  I was very impressed by the role the Quakers played in the 19th c. Being pacifist to the core, their sympathies were nevertheless roused to protest what they knew was a rule gone wrong, and were part of the abolitionist movement of the time. In fact, Quakers, peaceable and simple folk, harboured and abetted runaway slaves, helping them to escape their masters to the Canadian border! Quaker leaders, who may have owned slaves, were eventually replaced by those who did not own slaves. In 1780, Pennsylvania, the heart of Quaker country in the United States, passed An Act for the Gradual Abolishment of Slavery. The Quakers were hated and ridiculed by slave owners in response. Their moral conviction came at a cost to themselves, and many from the South found themselves migrating west as a result of such antagonism and hostility from the wider community.

Slavery was a social, economic and deeply political issue of the West in the 19th c. The Quakers weren’t the only community with conscience. Many others rose in quiet revolt against such injustice. The evangelical Christian politician, William Wilberforce is one name that comes to mind. A British parliamentarian, he spent most of his career trying to pass the Anti-slavery bill at Parliament. Wilberforce was ridiculed and criticised for his “cause”. He laboured for twenty-six years before the Slave Trade Act 1807 was passed. He died just three days after hearing that the passage of the Act through Parliament was assured. John Newton, ex-slave trader and Anglican priest, was William Wilberforce’s friend and ally. Though his Christian conversion did not have an immediate impact on his views of slavery, he eventually came to a change of mind about it. He wrote a powerful pamphlet titled, “Thoughts Upon the Slave Trade”, and sent it to every MP. He lived to see the 1807 Act passed.

These individuals, whose moral convictions threw them into the political cauldron of their societies, did not hesitate to act in accord with what they believed. Christians today shy away from the public and political sphere because we think our faith is extremely personal (“Jesus came to die for me, me and me”). But politics is concerned about worldviews and perspectives. Doesn’t the Church’s mission involve the shaping of society for its moral betterment? Isn’t that what all that business about being salt and light translates into?

When Jesus gave his Manifesto in the Sermon on the Mount, was he as “apolitical” as we think (“My kingdom is not of this world”)? If it were so, why did the Jewish authorities feel so threatened by him? Why did they succeed in twisting the Roman governor’s arm to execute Jesus for treason? Wasn’t it because Jesus preached about the “kingdom” or government of God on earth? And doesn’t that deal with issues of law, authorities, government etc etc? In other words, “politics”? Of course, he wasn’t part of any political party. But Jesus’ “politics” involved the total redemption of the world, the cosmos, the society and community of human beings … The renewed heavens and earth will see a new government, a new social system, a new politics and economics at play … no aspect of human society will be unchanged or un-transformed when the Lord of Lords returns.

In view of all this, where does Romans 13 come in? After all, Paul said what he said about obeying the authorities in a context of oppression and growing persecution. In the end, he was beheaded by an insane Nero.

But Paul had worked out his convictions: whatever was just, whatever was moral–stand on it! Since I began with slavery, let me end with it. Paul wrote to his friend Philemon, a Colossian slave master and Christian leader, on behalf of his runaway slave, Onesimus. While Paul did not light candles or march in protest against slavery (haha!), it’s more than clear in his epistle to Philemon what he thought of it. For him to even speak on behalf of a non-entity, a slave, would have been something to note. For him to insist that Philemon receive Onesimus not only as a returning slave, but now, as a man and brother in the Lord, was revolutionary. Philemon was to regard Onesimus the slave (a non-person) as a person, with full and legitimate status as a citizen of heaven and a child of God. In fact, Paul indirectly suggests, give him his papers and set him free. After all, he is already set free in Christ!

Paul was not in two minds about such matters. Romans 13 talks about orderly society and obeying the authorities. So we should. Our engagement and participation in the wider community is crucial to its enrichment and betterment. We ought to work towards good society, politics, economics and spirituality. We ought to be there in the frontline when justice and goodness are threatened, for those are the very qualities of God expressed in good governance in human communities. Where there is injustice and oppression, our stand is as clear as Paul’s: we must be against it. However we do it, we must make it crystal clear that we will not tolerate what is evil, what is dictatorial, what is manipulative.

There is no sphere of life that Christ’s gospel does not touch and transform. There cannot be if he is supreme over the universe, the One who holds all things together (Colossians 1: 17). We have a mandate, and that is to go and affect society for God’s sake. These days, we are hearing a clarion call for Christians to be agents of change in the world. Hey, if that just means holding hands and singing nice songs within the safe confines of our church buildings, none of our saltiness is going to go anywhere. It just doesn’t cut it. If we’re too chicken to even encourage our people to register as voters in church (“Oh no! We can’t be seen to be involved in … politics! *gasp*”), we’re probably too chicken to stand for anything.

Agents of change in the world? Well, we’d better get our politics right, then.