The Emperor’s New Clothes

Editor Posted in A Devotional Life,Tags:
0

“The Emperor’s New Clothes” is a short tale by Hans Christian Andersen about two weavers who promise an Emperor a new suit of clothes invisible to those unfit for their positions or incompetent. When the Emperor parades before his subjects in his new clothes, a child cries out, “But he isn’t wearing anything at all!” (Taken from Wikipedia)

 

14“To the angel of the church in Laodicea write:
      These are the words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the ruler of God’s creation. 15I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! 16So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth. 17You say, ‘I am rich; I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing.’ But you do not realize that you are wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked. 18I counsel you to buy from me gold refined in the fire, so you can become rich; and white clothes to wear, so you can cover your shameful nakedness; and salve to put on your eyes, so you can see .19Those whom I love I rebuke and discipline. So be earnest, and repent. 20Here I am! I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in and eat with him, and he with me. 21To him who overcomes, I will give the right to sit with me on my throne, just as I overcame and sat down with my Father on his throne. 22He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.”  (Revelation 3: 14-22)

 

When Hans Christian Andersen wrote his short story, he meant it for satirical purposes. He aimed to hit at bourgeois vanity in his society. What was true in his day and society is true of us today. Particularly for Christians, religious faith seems to have devolved, in recent decades, to a kind of  unwholesome spiritual scheme that focuses on material success and well-being. Being blessed by God materially is uppermost in our minds and desires as a key indicator of God’s pleasure and favour. We think of spiritual success in terms of huge physical proportions.  XL is always preferable to M or S or XS.

Hans Christian Andersen (Public Domain)

We forget many other considerations in this bid to climb the spiritual ladder of success. The Revelation chapter on the worldly church at Laodicea is meant for such as us. John the Divine had probably had his fair share of worldly Christians and churches in his own day. Doubtless his gorge rose too at the sight of such an abuse and devaluation of the gospel of salvation into the gospel of health and wealth, of big and rich …

In Andersen’s tale, it took the simple common sense reasoning and innocence of a child to point out the obvious: “But he isn’t wearing anything at all!” In contrast to the mincing courtiers and sycophants milling around the king, it was the unpretentious nature of the child that exposed the king’s vanity. It also put into clear perspective the hypocrisy and self-preservation of the simpering and fawning adults.

In John’s Revelation, it was the flaming eye of Christ that bore down on the Laodicean church in a stern rebuke: “You say, ‘I am rich; I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing.’ But you do not realize that you are wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked” (v. 17). There is none so blind as he who will not see. Laodicea was an extremely rich city in John’s day. It was well-known for its glossy black wool, a reputable medical school and a miraculous eye salve. It boasted of its own greatness and saw itself as self-sufficient and superior. Proud and confident of its riches, arrogant in its conception of itself, Laodicea thought itself a cut above.

But one thing that Laodicea did not have was an adequate water supply of its own. It imported water from the hot springs of neighbouring Hierapolis and the cool, clear streams of snow-capped Colosse. By the time the stone pipes or aqueducts delivered the water to Laodicea, however, it was lukewarm, neither hot nor cold. The lukewarm water was also bitter and full of sediment. Whatever else the Laodiceans claimed to have, they did not have this one thing: pure and living water. This made all the difference. Like their city, the church was just as lacking. Their perspective was skewed because they did not possess the life that living water promised. They had become lukewarm, self-satisfied and complacent. Clogged up with the sediment of their worldly perspectives, they had come to smugly feel that they were an exemplar of spiritual success to everyone else.

The pretensions and blindness of the successful Laodiceans were castigated by an uncompromising Christ: “I am about to spit you out” (v. 16). Boasting a miracle eye salve was no guarantee of spiritual sightedness. Having much material wealth was not the condition of favour with God. It must have stung the Laodiceans to have their spiritual inadequacies flung at them by none other than the Lord they claimed to worship. Yet there was no other way around the problem. Their self-deception and insensitivity to the true state of their souls had to be stripped off. Otherwise, their spiritual state was so intolerable to a holy God that he had to spit them out. The translation “to spit” for the Greek word emew is not strong enough. It should be more rightly translated “to vomit”, because that is the strength of Christ’s revulsion to the Laodiceans’ tepid and nauseating “spirituality”. In other words, Christ was saying, “You make me so sick I want to throw up!”

The tragedy of the Laodicean church was not that it was miserable, poor, beggarly, naked or blind, but that it was insensitive to its perilous state. Christ’s counsel was repentance: ”… buy from me gold refined in the fire, so you can become rich; and white clothes to wear, so you can cover your shameful nakedness; and salve to put on your eyes, so you can see ” (v. 18). Repentance or metanoia simply means a 180 degree turnaround, or a turning back. What the Laodiceans needed was a turning back to the way of life that had first been preached to them, a sloughing off of the corruption that had grown around them like sediment.

If they did, then Christ would fellowship with them (v. 20). They would again be called his friends and brothers, sharing with him both his sufferings and glory.  The opportunity for metanoia is not comfortable. It entails a recognition of shameful things done. It brings change at the cost of … everything. But like the emperor whose moment of wisdom came only when he saw the obvious truth of his own nakedness, we would each do well to heed the warning of Christ in a seasonable hour: “He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches” (v. 22). The opportunity might never come round again.

Although we speak in tongues …

Editor Posted in A Devotional Life,Tags:
0

 If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal (1 Corinthians 13: 1)

Jonathan Swift, who wrote Gulliver’s Travels, once made this observation: “We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.” He lived from 1667-1745, yet his times are little different from ours. In spite of centuries of so-called development, we still suffer from the same malaise of the soul: lovelessness. If that were not enough, then certainly, Paul’s stellar letter on love should convince. Written 2000 years ago, Paul began his treatise on love with a negative: “but have not love”. Apparently, lovelessness is a human and moral endemic that spans the centuries.

As it applies to the Body of Christ, there is no greater tragedy than the farce our quarrelling and divisiveness reveal of our community life. We are laughably divided and disunited. But is there a place for disagreement, even sharp words of contention among Christians? Naturally. Paul and Barnabas fell out so badly that they parted company (Acts 15: 36-41). But it is noteworthy that Paul acknowledged the later contribution of Mark (bone of contention) to the gospel years down the road (2 Timothy 4: 11; Colossians 4: 10-11). Needless to say, Paul observed the same principle and heart’s motive that he and the other apostles preached about, which was that love covered a multitude of sins and weaknesses (see 1 Peter 4: 7-8). 

He enjoyed a measure of reconciliation with Barnabas eventually. He was compelled to give John Mark a second chance at ministry, knowing full well the extent of his own culpabilities and sins. In fact Mark, in time, became a trusted co-worker of Paul’s. The message his behaviour sent out was that there was nothing that love could not bridge. No level of dissension, no difference of opinion, no controversy, no issue was too great for the peace of Christ, that surpasses all understanding, to cross. Indeed He is our peace that has broken down every wall (Ephesians 2: 14). If we do not grasp this early, then in truth we must confess that our lives are not lived according to kingdom values … there is no further need for comment or justification. We live or die by this rule. We must stand or fall by it.

Giving way to one another, preferring the other to oneself … these are hallmarks of the Christian life: “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another” (John 13: 34-35). Deference is not humiliation. Neither is it defeat. It is in fact the true humility that Jesus exhorts us to exhibit. If my brother has an issue with me, I am obliged to make peace with him, to give an account of myself to him … in order that he be not injured in spirit or in mind. I cannot remain silent, if my silence will hurt him. If I disagree with my brother, I am obliged to give him the benefit of the doubt, while expressing my concern and discomfort to him. I must do all I can to gently bring him to a point of conviction. But I cannot raise my hand against him to his hurt.

Suffice it to say that few of us follow Christ in any of this, which is why we have written many books and articles and preached many sermons to justify the odious things we do in His Name … Anything, rather than the obvious thing. Therefore, Paul’s chapter on love must not convict us from the peripheries of our conscience, but strike us hard in our heart of hearts: “ If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal.” In other words, I have nothing by which to commend myself, either to man or to God. I stand weightless in the scale of justice as well as the scale of love. I am much to be pitied, for in spite of loudly proclaiming that I have found the Christ, I have neither seen the truth of His forgiveness nor have I plumbed the depths of His unmeasured love.

To do justly …

Editor Posted in I Say ...,Tags:
0

      He has showed you, O man, what is good.
       And what does the LORD require of you?
       To act justly and to love mercy
       and to walk humbly with your God. (Micah 6: 8, NIV)
 

Dr. Pornthip Rojanasunam

(Photo courtesy of Malaysia Today)

Teoh Beng Hock’s (TBH) inquest was heard in court on Aug 18th, and much attention has focused on Dr. Pornthip Rojanasunan, the Thai pathologist engaged by the Selangor government on behalf of the family of TBH.  Teoh, a former political aide to Seri Kembangan assemblyman and Selangor exco Ean Yong Hian Wah, was found dead on the rooftop of the 5th floor of Plaza Masalam on July 16 2009. He had been questioned by MACC officers at their Selangor headquarters over alleged misuse of allocations by several Pakatan Rakyat assemblymen.

Pornthip’s earlier 80% homicide theory of Teoh’s COD (cause of death) has been tossed about in rival papers, just as much as it was argued in court, I suppose. Web commenters are legion out there too. Everyone wants to get into the fray in this very high profile investigation. Dr. Pornthip’s expert views have been long hoped-for and anticipated by many Malaysians. There was earlier uncertainty too whether she would testify in Malaysia, since there had been talk of harassment. But yesterday settled all that. Dr. Pornthip arrived in court, dressed as we all expected, in true (s-)punky rock costume with flashy accessories and a head of dramatically-coloured hair!

Of course, the MACC hired its own forensic expert as well, Dr. Peter Vanezis of the UK (of Lady Diana fame). Both pathologists gave opposing interpretations of the fall resulting in death (Was TBH conscious? Was he unconscious?), which is why things are hotting up this side of the globe.

At the inquest, what stood out during Pornthip’s examination by Deputy public prosecutor Datuk Abdul Razak Musa for the MACC, was the raison d’etre of her vocation: she speaks for the dead who have no voice and no recourse to justice. Dr. Pornthip is the director general of the Thai Central Institute of Forensic Science, which comes under the Thai Ministry of Justice. Just google her name and you will find an impressive list of things she has been up to in Thailand. From her forensic involvement in the 2006 tsunami that hit Thailand’s Phuket Island to investigations into so-called suicides of Thai politicians, Dr. Pornthip has maintained a level of independence and integrity that few people have courage to demonstrate. Frequently at odds with the Thai police, Dr. Pornthip has made a name for herself by insisting on the application of forensic science and objective evidence in homicide and/or suicide cases rather than just circumstantial evidence.

She has been dubbed “Dr. Death” in Thailand, meaning that her closest associations are with those she “defends” and gives voice to: the dead. Her autopsies are often battlegrounds for truth and justice as she determines the COD of victims and uncompromisingly goes public with it. She has made such an impact (not always desired) that National Geographic Channel filmed a documentary of her life and work. Unconventional in appearance and attitude, Dr. Pornthip stands for both a respect for those who have unjustifiably died and an unmoving conviction that the truth must always be told and upheld, at all costs.

Dr. Pornthip is a devout Buddhist. Her motivation in her work comes from what she believes the dead have asked her to do: speak for them, and bring forensic science in as the yardstick of murder/suicide investigations. She cannot rest till she feels she has done that. Her standards are high as they are without compromise, regardless of what her critics say of her. I couldn’t help but think that Micah 6: 8, which spells out as clearly as we can read God’s moral requirements of us as individuals and a society, describes her to a T. I wonder which of us, who own familiarity with that scripture, can truly say that we live and speak for justice and truth with at least that same unshakable conviction?

TBH faced a tragic and untimely death. Perhaps in the ways of the unseen eternal, God has worked out that a wiry and flame-haired Thai lady would be the one to raise questions and doubts enough for complacent Malaysians to say we want a fairer judiciary, an independent anti-corruption bureau and a better police force. Far be it from me to even suggest that Dr. Pornthip is right in every particular and others wrong, but I’m delighted and encouraged to see that it is an Asian, and a woman at that, who has felt the burden for justice where others have closed their eyes.

Micah 6: 8 reverberates with us in these uncertain days … God’s standards have not changed. His eyes still run to and fro, looking to test the ways of man.